• Syam Rachma Marcillia
  • Diana Kesumasari



Sitting preferences, student activity, plaza in educational institution.


The purpose of this research is to understand the relationship between sitting preferences and student activities by taking the case of public plaza at the Central Office of the Faculty of Engineering (KPFT) Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM) in Yogyakarta. KPFT UGM as research object is divided into five zones, namely Zone A (west), Zone B and C (south), and Zone D and E (north). Field observation was done within one month period during working days (weekday) and weekends with observation time: in the morning (08.00-10.00), noon (12-14.00), and afternoon (16.00-18.00). In each of the observation zone, a place-centered mapping was investigated continuously. Informal interview and the questionnaire from 200 students as respondents also undertaken in this research. The results of this study showed that the students’ sitting preferences in the KPFT UGM influenced by the activities that they did. Some of the factors that affect the students’ sitting preferences are: 1) type of activities, 2) the number of people engage in the activity, 3) privacy needs, 4) the needs of the facilities, and 5) the distance between sitting zone in the KPFT UGM and the students’ major buildings.


Download data is not yet available.


Altman, I. (1975). The Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory and Crowding, Brooks – Cole Publishing Company, Monterey, California.

Faizati, A. (2013). Student Square di Yogyakarta Sebagai Pusat Aktivitas Belajar Mandiri Pelajar dengan Konsep Playful, Pra Tugas Akhir S1 Arsitektur.

Haghighi, M. M., Jusan, M. M. (2012). Exploring Students Behavior on Seating Arrangements in Learning Environment: A Review, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 36, pp. 287– 294.

Halim, D. (2005). Psikologi Arsitektur (Pengantar Kajian Lintas Disiplin), Grasindo, Jakarta., accesed October, 7th, 2016.

Keskin, Z., Chen, Y., Fotios, S. (2015). Daylight and Seating Preference In Open Plan Library Spaces, International Journal of Sustainable Lighting, 1, pp.12-20.

Laurens, J. M. (2005). Arsitektur Perilaku Manusia, Grasindo, Jakarta.

Lomas, C., Oblinger, D. G. (2006). Student Practices and Their Impact on Learning Spaces, in Learning Spaces Handbook (ed. Oblinger Diana G.), an Educause e-book.

McDaniel, S. (2014). Every Space is a Learning Space: Encouring Informal Learning and Collaboration in Higher Education Envirnoments, BWBR, April 2014, pp. 1-8.

Painter, S. et. al. (2013). Research on Learning Space Design: Present State, Future Directions, Report from the Recipients of the 2012 Perry Chapman Prize, Society for College and University Planning, pp.1-40.

Puspita, A. A. (2013). Kajian terhadap Sarana Duduk Publik Kampus dengan Pendekatan Perilaku dan Aktivitas Warga Kampus (Studi Kasus pada Kampus Institut Teknologi Bandung Ganesha), Jurnal Vis. Art & Des, 5(1), pp.1-19.

Riddle, M. D. & Souter Key (2012). Designing Informal Learning Spaces Using Student Perspectives, Journal of Learning Spaces, 1(2).

Young, V. E. (2003). Can We Encourage Learning by Shaping Environment? Patterns of Seating Behavior in Undergraduates, ACRL Eleventh National Conference, April 10.13, 2003, Charlotte, North Carolina.




How to Cite

Marcillia, S. R., & Kesumasari, D. (2017). STUDENTS’ SITTING PREFERENCES AT PLAZA IN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION. Dimensi: Journal of Architecture and Built Environment, 44(2), 179-188.