A Behavior-Responsive Spatial Framework for Adolescent Institutional Care

Translating Environmental Psychology into Orphanage Design

Authors

  • Meyga Fitri Handayani Nasution Universitas Prima Indonesia
  • Andiyan Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Stephanus Wirawan Dharmatanna Universitas Kristen Petra
  • Ai Siti Munawaroh Mie University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.53.2.149-160

Keywords:

behavior-responsive design, environmental psychology, adolescent spatial behavior, orphanage design

Abstract

The current environment in children’s homes is still unable to fully meet young people’s needs for privacy, comfort, a sense of belonging, and healthy social relationships. Such conditions can affect young people’s psychosocial development in their daily lives. This study advances a behavior-responsive spatial framework for adolescent institutional care through a qualitative case study at the Darul Aitam Orphanage, Medan, Indonesia. Data were collected through behavioral mapping, structured observation, semi-structured interviews, and questionnaires involving sixteen adolescents aged 12–18, and analyzed using four environmental psychology constructs: personal space, territoriality, crowding, and privacy. Thermal discomfort is a major factor contributing to spatial stress. In bedrooms, a personal space of 60–100 cm is always maintained. Spatial clarity is reduced due to overlapping room functions. Comparative analysis was used to identify spatial designs based on criteria such as interpersonal distance, territorial hierarchy, density reduction, privacy, thermal ventilation, and sensory-stimulating materials. These parameters form a transferable framework for improving spatial quality in orphanage environments. By converting behavioral constructs into measurable spatial thresholds, the study positions behavior-responsive architecture as an evidence-based methodology for adolescent institutional design in comparable tropical institutional contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Meyga Fitri Handayani Nasution, Universitas Prima Indonesia

    Department of Architecture, Universitas Prima Indonesia, Medan, Indonesia

    Center of Excellence for Spatial Planning, Universitas Prima Indonesia, Medan, Indonesia

  • Andiyan, Universitas Gadjah Mada

    Doctoral Student in Architecture, Department of Architecture and Planning, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

    Department of Architecture, Universitas Winaya Mukti, Bandung, Indonesia

  • Stephanus Wirawan Dharmatanna, Universitas Kristen Petra

    Department of Architecture, Universitas Kristen Petra, Surabaya, Indonesia

  • Ai Siti Munawaroh, Mie University

    Graduate School of Engineering, Systems Engineering Division, Design Systems Laboratory, Mie University, Tsu, Japan

References

Adi, A. R., Afiq, M., & Pamungkas, D. P. (2022). Integration Analysis of Thermal and Daylight Performance Through The Building Envelope. DIMENSI (Journal of Architecture and Built Environment), 49(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.49.2.87-98

Altman, I. (1975). The Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory, Crowding. Cole Publishing.

Bachtiar, J. C. U. (2023). Transformasi Teritori berdasarkan Kegiatan Pengunjung di Lapangan Gasibu. Review of Urbanism and Architectural Studies, 21(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.ruas.2023.021.01.3

Bocheńska-Skałecka, A., & Walter, E. (2020). Application of the Integrated Design Process (IDP) Method to the Design of Riverside on the Example of Żmigród (Poland). Sustainability, 12(16), 6684. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166684

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. SAGE Publications.

Cung, R., & Rosetia, A. (2023). Identifying Thermal Comfort of Tropical Architectural Concept Building : A Case Study of Expandable House. Journal of Architectural Research and Education, 5(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.17509/jare.v5i1.55723

Duman, Ü., & Uzunoğlu, K. (2021). The Importance of Universal Design for the Disabled in Public Buildings: A Public Building in Northern Cyprus as a Case Study. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 9(3), 690–707. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2021.090312

Fitriaty, P., Basri, I. S., Bassaleng, A. J. R., Burhany, N. R., & Butudoka, Z. (2024). Thermal Performance Analysis of Affordable House in the Equatorial Coastal Area of the Tropics. Interdiciplinary Journal and Hummanity (Injurity), 3(2). https://doi.org/10.58631/injurity.v3i2.178

Garau, C., & Annunziata, A. (2020). Supporting Children’s Independent Activities in Smart and Playable Public Places. Sustainability, 12(20), 8352. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208352

Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin.

Gümüş, İ., & Erdönmez, E. (2021). Impact of Spatial Configuration to Spatial Quality: Venice and Istanbul. JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM, 45(2), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2021.14306

Hall, E. T. (1969). The Hidden Dimension. Anchor Books. https://archive.org/details/hiddendimensionhall00hall

Holahan, C. J. (1982). Environmental Psychology. Random House. https://archive.org/details/environmentalpsy0000hola

Irsyad, N. A., Dewi, O. C., & Rahmasari, K. (2023). Study Recommendations To Achieve Thermal Comfort In An Educational Building. DIMENSI (Journal of Architecture and Built Environment), 50(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.50.1.1-12

Ismail, M. N., Sapian, A. R., Scriver, P., & Rashid, M. (2017). Translation of Social Citizenship to Architecture & Built Environment: A Methodological Review. Planning Malaysia Journal, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.21837/pmjournal.v15.i6.239

Jansson, M., Herbert, E., Zalar, A., & Johansson, M. (2022). Child-Friendly Environments—What, How and by Whom? Sustainability, 14(8), 4852. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084852

Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge University Press.

Kementerian Sosial Republik Indonesia. (2023). Data Lembaga Kesejahteraan Sosial Anak (LKSA) Nasional 2023.

Liang, J., Jiang, J., Hei, J., & Zhang, J. (2025). Responsive Therapeutic Environments: A Dual-Track Review of the Research Literature and Design Case Studies in Art Therapy for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Buildings, 15(15), 2735. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15152735

Makkonen, J., Latikka, R., Kaukonen, L., Laine, M., & Väänänen, K. (2023). Advancing residents’ use of shared spaces in Nordic superblocks with intelligent technologies. AI & SOCIETY, 38(3), 1167–1184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01604-x

Mba, E. J., Okeke, F. O., Ezema, E. C., Oforji, P. I., & Ozigbo, C. A. (2023). Post Occupancy Evaluation of Ventilation Coefficient Desired for Thermal Comfort in Educational Facilities. Journal of Human, Earth, and Future, 4(1), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.28991/HEF-2023-04-01-07

Nitidara, N. P. A., Sarwono, J., & Suprijanto, S. (2025). Multisensory Comfort in Public Open Spaces: Predicting Perceived Comfort from Environmental Conditions. DIMENSI (Journal of Architecture and Built Environment), 52(2), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.52.2.121-128

Padmasari, N. F. I., & Hariyadi, A. (2023). Study on Thermal Comfort Factors in Conversion-Adaptive Building, Case Study in Surakarta Indische House. Built Environment Studies, 4(1), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.22146/best.v4i1.7136

Ramadani, D., Zahriah, Z., & Priandi, R. (2025). Evaluation of Natural Lighting in the Lecture Room of the Graduate School of Syiah Kuala University. Review of Urbanism and Architectural Studies, 23(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.ruas.2025.023.01.6

Sanni-Anibire, M. O., & Adenle, Y. A. (2024). Residential satisfaction of vertical urban settlements in Hong Kong. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 22(6), 1705–1722. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-06-2022-0323

Silitonga, T. F. C., Simatupang, W. P. S., Ginting, L. C., Zaidan, M. A., & Vieri, H. C. (2023). Peran Panti Asuhan Yayasan Rumah Bakti Kasih Anak Indonesia dalam Membentuk Karakter Anak Panti. SOSMANIORA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 2(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.55123/sosmaniora.v2i1.1461

Tchinda, P. E., & Kim, S.-N. (2020). The Paradox of “Eyes on the Street”: Pedestrian Density and Fear of Crime in Yaoundé, Cameroon. Sustainability, 12(13), 5300. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135300

UNICEF Indonesia. (2021). Situation Analysis of Children in Indonesia: Child Protection and Alternative Care.

Yang, A. C. H., Lau, N., & Ho, J. C. F. (2020). The Role of Bedroom Privacy in Social Interaction among Elderly Residents in Nursing Homes: An Exploratory Case Study of Hong Kong. Sensors, 20(15), 4101. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20154101

Yusoff, W. F. M. (2021). Indoor Thermal Environment of Various Semi-Enclosed Atrium Configurations of Institutional Building in Tropical Climate. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 8(2), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v8.n2.710

Zeisel, J. (1981). Inquiry by Design: Tools for Environment-Behaviour Research. Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-26

How to Cite

A Behavior-Responsive Spatial Framework for Adolescent Institutional Care: Translating Environmental Psychology into Orphanage Design. (2026). DIMENSI: Journal of Architecture and Built Environment, 53(2), 149-160. https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.53.2.149-160