Cosmic Alignment and Social Shift

Reinterpreting Temple-Settlement Morphology in Central Java’s Living Sacred Landscape

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.52.2.155-167

Keywords:

Cosmological Orientation, Sacred Landscape Transformation, Social Shift

Abstract

This study examines the spatial differences between the cosmological orientations of Hindu-Buddhist temples and the evolving settlement patterns in Central Java. The focus of this research is on temples that are still considered sacred and actively used for religious rituals, such as Borobudur, Pawon, and Mendut (Buddhist), and Cetho and Sukuh (Hindu), which are closely linked to the settlement patterns of their surrounding areas. In comparison, the temples exhibit a symbolically directed orientation—generally toward the east, mountains, or sacred rivers—the surrounding settlement patterns now follow more pragmatic considerations such as accessibility, land economy, and tourism development. Methodologically, the study employs a qualitative-descriptive approach supported by Geographic Information System (GIS)-based spatial techniques using Google Earth. Azimuth analysis, overlay interpretation, and viewshed approximation are applied to examine temple orientations, settlement morphologies, and their symbolic relations to sacred topography. The concept of "social shift" is introduced to explain this gradual spatial deviation. This study strengthens the discourse on sacred landscape transformation. It offers an integrative heritage planning approach, taking into account the relationship between symbolic order and the spatial adaptation of modern society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Damayanti, R., & Handinoto. (2005). Kawasan “pusat kota” dalam perkembangan sejarah perkotaan di Jawa. DIMENSI, 33(1), 34-42. doi:https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.33.1.%25p

Degroot, V. (2009, May 6). Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, . Candi, SpaCe and Landscape- A study on the distribution, orientation and spatial organization of Central Javanese temple remains. Leiden, Netherlands: Sidestone Press.

Eliade, M. (1959). The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Fauzan, A. (2025). The Transformation of Traditional Culture in Responding to the Challenges of Globalization in Local Indonesian Communities. The Journal of Academic Science, 2(3), 1021-1030.

Fontein, J. (1990). The Lawu Complex: Java’s last Hindu temples. In The Sculpture of Indonesia. Washington, D.C.; New York: National Gallery of Art; Abrams.

Fox, J. J. (1993). Inside Austronesian Houses: Perspectives on Domestic Designs for Living. Canberra: ANU Press.

Guoqing, L., Binqing, C., Jie, Z., & Lie, S. (2023). Traditional Village research based on culture-landscape genes: a Case of Tujia traditional villages in Shizhu, Chongqing, China. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering-Taylor&Francis, 23(1), 325-343. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2023.2278880

Harriyadi, S. S. (2023). Latar belakang sejarah dan pertimbangan lokasi permukiman Candi Baru di Semarang. Amerta: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Arkeologi, 41(1), 1-16. doi:https://doi.org/10.55981/amt.2023.658

Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ikhsan, F. A., Setioko, B., & Suprapti, A. (2022). Exploring Architectural Orientation and Layout on Hindu Javanese Settlement toward Sustainable Cultural Landscape at Cetho Temple area, Indonesia. EM International-Ecology, Environment, and Conservation Paper, 28(3), S1-S7. doi:http://doi.org/10.53550/EEC.2022.v28i06s.001

Jordaan, R. E. (1996). The Śailendras and the Building of Borobudur. Indo-Iranian Journal, 1-25.

Maulidi, C. S. (2021). Kearifan ekosistem budaya pada tata ruang lanskap budaya Jawa kuno di DAS Kali Brantas. Tataloka, 23(2), 225–238. doi:https://doi.org/10.14710/tataloka.23.2.225-238

Nas, P. J. (2002). The Indonesian Town Revisited. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Norberg-Schulz, C. (1980). Genius Loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture. New York: Rizzoli.

Priatman, J. (2000). Perspektif arsitektur surya di Indonesia. DIMENSI, 28(1), 1-7.

Setyohadi, K. B. (2007). Tipologi pola spasial dan segregasi sosial lingkungan permukiman Candi Baru. Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan, UNNES, 9(2), 97-106. doi:https://doi.org/10.15294/jtsp.v9i2.1612

Silverman, H. (2011). Contested Cultural Heritage: Religion, Nationalism, Erasure, and Exclusion in a Global World. New York: Springer.

Soekmono, R. (1973). Candi: Fungsi dan Pengertiannya. Jakarta: Penerbit Bharata.

Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

UNESCO. (n.d.). Culture. Retrieved from Cultural heritage: 7 successes of UNESCO’s preservation work: https://www.unesco.org/en/cultural-heritage-7-successes-unescos-preservation-work#:~:text=Untuk%20membantu%20melestarikan%20warisan%20budaya,yang%20berkelanjutan%20bagi%20umat%20manusia

Downloads

Published

2025-12-17

How to Cite

Cosmic Alignment and Social Shift: Reinterpreting Temple-Settlement Morphology in Central Java’s Living Sacred Landscape. (2025). DIMENSI: Journal of Architecture and Built Environment, 52(2), 155-167. https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.52.2.155-167