Architecture as Programmatic Archive: Sustainable Conservation on Tunjungan Street History
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.52.1.83-94Keywords:
heritage, archive, sustainability, tunjungan, urbanismAbstract
This study presents a perspective where architecture can also designed as a model of archival representation in a historical urban space. It uses qualitative research-by-design and reflective architectural design methods, to consider Tunjungan Street's heritage as an exhibition space for contextual case for sustainable urban conservation through architectural thinking. The study identifies three principles: Movement as Program captures spatial movement to support walkability and more efficient use of resources; Heritage as Identity is about cultural character; and Urban Context as Sequence relates to social and ecological sustainability. Together, the principles structure design strategies that enable a reinterpretation of historical meaning-formally, in a material way—which represented progress for urban heritage interpretation through the lens of architectural programming. The study associated urban and sustainable growth to heritage design thinking through adaptive reuse, resilient heritage and socially engaged public places, making the case for the transformation of heritage design thinking as a model for the future. The study suggested a design-based model that positioned architectural programming as a strategic action for sustainable urban archiving, utilizing appropriation of exhibition strategies, and spatial sequencing as interpretations of the heritage of Tunjungan Street.
Downloads
References
Abudayyeh, R. (2021). Grafting interiority: generative methodologies between the natural and the synthetic. Interiority, 4(2), 249–266.
Atmodiwirjo, P., & Yatmo, Y. A. (2022). Responsive interior: tactics for adaptation and resilience. Interiority, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v5i2.238
Augustiniok, N., Houbart, C., Plevoets, B., & Van Cleempoel, K. (2025). Adaptive reuse of built heritage: conserving and designing with values. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 15(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-05-2023-0068
Awaliyah, D. nafiatul. (2024). Space making for collective well-being: design, dynamics, and implications. Advances in Civil Engineering and Sustainable Architecture, 6(2), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.9744/acesa.v6i2.13776
Benlin, O. D., & Sigit, A. L. (2013). Fungsi pedestrian jalan Tunjungan dari sirkulasi ke rekreasi: studi kasus berdasarkan kesejarahan. DIMENSI (Journal of Architecture and Built Environment), 40(2). https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.40.2.99-112
Cherry, E. (1998). Programming for design: From theory to practice. John Wiley & Sons.
Damayanti, R., & Redyantanu, B. P. (2022). Penelurusan ruang koridor kota dalam produksi ruang sosial temporal. LANGKAU BETANG: JURNAL ARSITEKTUR, 9(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.26418/lantang.v9i1.47672
Djebbour, I., & Biara, R. W. (2019). Sustainability comparative assessment of the adaptive reuse of heritage buildings as museums: case of TLEMCEN. Environmental Research, Engineering and Management, 75(3), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.erem.75.3.22133
Fouseki, K. (2022). Heritage dynamics: understanding and adapting to change in diverse heritage contexts. UCL Press.
Groat, L. N., & Wang, D. (2013). Architectural research methods. Wiley. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=0jADDQAAQBAJ
Krisetya, A. T., & Navastara, A. M. (2019). Identifikasi karakteristik fisik koridor jalan Tunjungan sebagai ruang publik. Jurnal Teknik ITS, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.12962/j23373539.v7i2.32695
Kusliansjah, Y. K., & Patriajaya, A. C. (2022). Integrated design concept for identifiable commercial heritage tourism in Tunjungan District of Surabaya City (pp. 3–14). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11232-4_1
Kwanda, T. (2004). Desain bangunan baru pada kawasan pelestarian di Surabaya. Dimensi Teknik Arsitektur, 3(2), 102–109.
Lanz, F., & Pendlebury, J. (2022). Adaptive reuse: a critical review. The Journal of Architecture, 27(2–3), 441–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2022.2105381
Li, Y., Zhao, L., Huang, J., & Law, A. (2021). Research frameworks, methodologies, and assessment methods concerning the adaptive reuse of architectural heritage: a review. Built Heritage, 5(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-021-00025-x
Madanayake, U., & Manewa, A. (2014). Sustainable implications of building reuse and adaptation. The Third World Construction Symposium 2014: Sustainability and Development in Built Environment.
Patriajaya, A. C., & Kusliansjah, Y. K. (2019). Hilangnya karakter pedestrian shopping street Jalan Tunjungan akibat transformasi Surabaya sebagai Kota Metropolitan. Hartshorn 1992, 73–84.
Plevoets, B., & Van Cleempoel, K. (2019). Adaptive reuse of the built heritage. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315161440
Redyantanu, B. P. (2020). Potensi pengembangan blok segitiga Tunjungan sebagai bagian dari pembentuk citra kota. ATRIUM Jurnal Arsitektur. https://doi.org/10.21460/atrium.v3i1.63
Redyantanu, B. P. (2023). Fleksibilitas dan adaptabilitas ruang domestikberbasis arsitektur keseharian. Idealog: Ide Dan Dialog Desain Indonesia, 8(1), 14. http://journals.telkomuniversity.ac.id/idealog/article/view/5455
Sassi, P. (2006). Strategies for sustainable architecture. Taylor & Francis.
Schön. (1983). The reflective practitioner : how professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Sidik, N., Basundoro, P., Asmorowati, S., & Nurhidayati, S. (2024). The romance of Tunjungan Street in the concept of urbanism heritage. PARAFRASE : Jurnal Kajian Kebahasaan & Kesastraan, 24(2), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.30996/parafrase.v24i2.12004
Sosa, M., Ahmad, L., & Musfy, K. (2022). Adaptive ephemeral interiority: upcycling site specific interiors. Interiority, 5(2), 155.
Staehr, E. R., Stevik, T. K., & Houck, L. D. (2025). Adaptability in the building process: a multifaceted perspective across the life cycle of a building. Buildings, 15(7), 1119. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15071119
Sutikno, K. A. S., Irwanto, B. J., Sebastian, I., Soewitno, V. E., Harsono, Y. A., Mahendra, R., & Kusumowidagdo, A. (2024). The Tunjungan Street’s physical evidence that attract the visitor in Surabaya. Aksen : Journal of Design and Creative Industry, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.37715/aksen.v8i3.4638
Till, J. (2009). Architecture depends (Vol. 55). MIT press.
Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. U of Minnesota Press.
Verbeke, J. (2013). This is research by design. In Design research in architecture (pp. 137–160). Routledge.
Vidler, A. (2003). Toward a theory of the architectural program. October, 106, 59–74.
Walsh, S. J., & Shotton, E. (2024). Integrating design for adaptability, disassembly, and reuse into architectural design practice. Sustainability, 16(17), 7771. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177771
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
