Learning Flow in Café
The Role of Spatial Characteristics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.52.2.110-120Keywords:
flow, café, informal learningAbstract
Cafés have often been used as informal learning spaces by Indonesian college students in recent years. However, as a public space, cafes are considered by several people as not suitable for learning activities that require a high level of concentration. This research aims to identify café spatial characteristics that can affect learning activities and students’ flow experience. Flow, as defined by Csikszentmihalyi (1990), refers to a state in which individuals engage in an activity with deep concentration, a sense of control, and intrinsic enjoyment, often accompanied by a loss of time awareness. The relationship between the state of flow and learning activities is also explored. The research uses a mixed-method approach. In the first stage, an exploratory qualitative study was conducted to indentify key spatial factors and patterns of student learning in cafés. In the second stage, an explanatory quantitative study was carried out, using closed-endded questions derived from the qualitative findings to test the realtionships between spatial characteristics, flow dimensions, and learning activities through factor analysis, regression, and correlation analysis. The analysis results show enjoyment as the dimension of flow experience students tend to encounter when studying in cafes. The findings implied that café spatial characteristics must stimulate positive emotions, prevent visual and audial distractions, and promote social interactions between learners to boost flow and smooth the learning activities.
Downloads
References
Adityawirawan, S. S. K., & Kusuma, H. E. (2021). Café As Students' Informal Learning Space: a Case Study in Bandung, Indonesia. DIMENSI (Journal of Architecture and Built Environment), 48(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.48.2.109-120
Ayalp, N., Yildirim, K., & Çağatay, K. (2017). Effect on Users of the Seating Element Types in Cafés / Restaurants. Gazi University Journal of Science, 30(4), 15–28.
Beckers, R., van der Voordt, T., & Dewulf, G. (2015). A conceptual framework to identify spatial implications of new ways of learning in higher education. Facilities, 33(1/2), 2–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-02-2013-0013
Beckers, R., van der Voordt, T., & Dewulf, G. (2016). Why do they study there? Diary research into students’ learning space choices in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, 35(1), 142–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1123230
Bryant, J., Matthews, G., & Walton, G. (2009). Academic libraries and social and learning space. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 41(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000608099895
Callanan, M., Cervantes, C., & Loomis, M. (2011). Informal learning. WIREs Cognitive Science, 2(6), 646–655. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.143
Cox, A. M. (2018). Space and embodiment in informal learning. Higher Education, 75(6), 1077–1090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0186-1
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper & Row.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Flow and Education. In Applications of Flow in Human Development and Education (pp. 129–151). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9094-9_6
Erwiza, E., Kartiko, S., & Gimin, G. (2019). Factors Affecting the Concentration of Learning and Critical Thinking on Student Learning Achievement in Economic Subject. Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(2), 205. https://doi.org/10.31258/jes.3.2.p.205-215
Gottfried, A. E. (2009). Commentary: The Role of Environment in Contextual and Social Influences on Motivation: Generalities, Specificities, and Causality. In K. R. Wentzel & D. B. Miele (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation at School (pp. 462–475). Routledge.
Grimm, L. G., & Yarnold, P. R. (Eds.). (1995). Reading and Understanding Multivariate Statistics. American Psychological Association.
Hanson, W. E., Creswell, J. W., Clark, V. L. P., Petska, K. S., & Creswell, J. D. (2005). Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.224
Harrop, D., & Turpin, B. (2013). A Study Exploring Learners’ Informal Learning Space Behaviors, Attitudes, and Preferences. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 19(1), 58–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2013.740961
Hunter, J., & Cox, A. (2014). Learning over tea! Studying in informal learning spaces. New Library World, 115(1/2), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-08-2013-0063
Kolfschoten, G., French, S., & Brazier, F. (2014). A discussion of the cognitive load in collaborative problem-solving. 257–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40070-014-0034-9
Kumar, R. (2005). Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Kusuma, H. E. (2009). Memilih Metode Analisis Kuantitatif untuk Penelitian Arsitektur. Seminar Nasional Metodologi Penelitian Arsitektur.
Oldenburg, R. (1989). Great Good Place Cafes, Coffe Shops,Bookstores, Bars, Hair Salons and Other Hangout at the Heart of the Community. In Da Capo Press.
Purwadi, Y. S., & Manurung, E. M. (2020). Cafes: New Learning and Knowledge Production Space for Millennial Students. Journal of Economics and Business, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1992.03.01.194
Qismullah, F. I., Fakriah, N., & Safira, N. (2022). Penggunaan Cafes Dan Warung Kopi Sebagai Thinking Space Oleh Mahasiswa Di Aceh. Jurnal Geuthèë: Penelitian Multidisiplin, 5(2), 161. https://doi.org/10.52626/jg.v5i2.173
Steigemann, A. M. (2017). Social practices in a café: Community through consumption? Geographica Helvetica, 72(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-72-45-2017
Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. W. (2007). Editorial: Exploring the Nature of Research Questions in Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 207–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807302814
Tyng, C. M., Amin, H. U., Saad, M. N. M., & Malik, A. S. (2017). The Influences of Emotion on Learning and Memory. 8(August). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01454
Waxman, L. (2006). The Coffee Shop: Social and Physical factors Influencing Place Attachment. Journal of Interior Design, 31(3), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1668.2006.tb00530.x
Wu, X., Kou, Z., Oldfield, P., Heath, T., & Borsi, K. (2021). Informal learning spaces in higher education: Student preferences and activities. Buildings, 11(6), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11060252
Zhou, J., Lam, E., Au, C. H., Lo, P., & Chiu, D. K. W. (2022). Library café or elsewhere: usage of study space by different majors under contemporary technological environment. Library Hi Tech, 40(6), 1567–1581. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-03-2021-0103
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
