Criteria in Utilizing Engineered Wood in Residential Construction

A Community Preference Analysis

Authors

  • Eryonata Melino Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Dewi Larasati Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Hanson E Kusuma Institut Teknologi Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.52.1.71-82

Keywords:

Construction Management, Cost, Design, Durability, Experience, Material Performance

Abstract

The phenomenon of global warming continues to intensify, with the construction sector emerging as a significant contributor due to its extensive use of non-biomass materials, which are major sources of carbon emissions. In response, engineered wood has gained attention as a sustainable alternative, offering the potential to reduce emissions and sequester carbon. This study aims to explore public perceptions of engineered wood, focusing on how these perceptions shape preferences and interest in its application for residential construction. The study does not evaluate technical characteristics directly, but rather community interpretations of them. A mixed-methods approach was employed, beginning with qualitative research through online questionnaires that featured open-ended questions designed to capture homeowners and prospective buyers preferences. The responses were then analyzed using content analysis to identify emerging themes. In the second phase, quantitative research was conducted by distributing closed-question questionnaires informed by the findings from the initial phase. The data was analyzed using factor analysis, distribution analysis, and multivariate regression techniques. The study identified three key dimensions influencing material preferences: sustainability, material durability, and material performance. Additionally, three significant dimensions related to construction characteristics were uncovered: design appreciation, construction methods, and material availability. These findings provide valuable insights for the integration of engineered wood into residential construction, offering a pathway to more sustainable building practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdurrahman, I. N., Gultom, H. J., & Desmaliana, E. (2018). Kajian Eksperimental Sifat Mekanik Panel Cross Laminated Timber Kayu Sengon dan Kayu Jabon (Hal. 78-87). RekaRacana: Jurnal Teknil Sipil, 4(4), 78. https://doi.org/10.26760/rekaracana.v4i4.78

Balasbaneh, A. T., & Sher, W. (2024). Economic and environmental life cycle assessment of alternative mass timber walls to evaluate circular economy in building: MCDM method. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(1), 239–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02707-7

Bayat, M. (2023). Types of Engineered Wood and Their Uses. In J. Zhang (Ed.), Current Applications of Engineered Wood. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.112545

Bhandari, S., Riggio, M., Jahedi, S., Fischer, E. C., Muszynski, L., & Luo, Z. (2023). A review of modular cross laminated timber construction: Implications for temporary housing in seismic areas. Journal of Building Engineering, 63, 105485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105485

Bhkari, N. M., Chen, L. W., Nordin, M. S., Zainal, N. S., Za’ba, N. I. L., & Ahmad, Z. (2023). Mechanical Properties of Laminated Veneer Lumber (LVL) Fabricated from Three Malaysian Hardwood Species. International Journal of Integrated Engineering, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.30880/ijie.2023.15.01.034

Brandner, R., Flatscher, G., Ringhofer, A., Schickhofer, G., & Thiel, A. (2016). Cross laminated timber (CLT): overview and development. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 74(3), 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-015-0999-5

Costa, D., Serra, J., Quinteiro, P., & Dias, A. C. (2024). Life cycle assessment of wood-based panels: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 444, 140955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140955

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Crovella, P., Smith, W., & Bartczak, J. (2019). Experimental verification of shear analogy approach to predict bending stiffness for softwood and hardwood cross-laminated timber panels. Construction and Building Materials, 229, 116895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116895

D’Amico, B., Pomponi, F., & Hart, J. (2021). Global potential for material substitution in building construction: The case of cross laminated timber. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123487

de Serres-Lafontaine, C., Blanchet, P., Charron, S., Delem, L., & Wastiels, L. (2024). Bio-Based Innovations in Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) Envelopes: A Hygrothermal and Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) Study. Available at SSRN 4615698, 256(March). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111499

Diredja, N. V., Nuranita, B., Desmaliana, E., & Pertiwi, A. C. (2021). Kajian Analisis Perbandingan Rangka Atap Kuda-Kuda Menggunakan Kayu LVL dan Baja Ringan. RekaRacana: Jurnal Teknil Sipil, 7(3), 148. https://doi.org/10.26760/rekaracana.v7i3.148

Dong, Y., Cui, X., Yin, X., Chen, Y., & Guo, H. (2019). Assessment of energy saving potential by replacing conventional materials by cross laminated timber (CLT)-A case study of office buildings in China. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 9(5), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9050858

Duan, Z. (2023). Impact of climate change on the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of cross-laminated timber and reinforced concrete buildings in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 395(December 2022), 136446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136446

Eslami, H., Yaghma, A., Jayasinghe, L. B., & Waldmann, D. (2024). Comparative life cycle assessment of light frame timber and reinforced concrete masonry structural systems for single-family houses in Luxembourg. Heliyon, 10(4), e26083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26083

Fasasi, M. O. (2024). ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF ENGINEERED WOOD PRODUCTS ON SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY WITH CONVENTIONAL CONCRETE BUILDING METHODS. Open Journal of Engineering Science (ISSN: 2734-2115), 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.52417/ojes.v5i1.588

Fatima, N., Li, Y., Li, X., Abbas, W., Jabeen, G., Zahra, T., Işık, C., Ahmed, N., Ahmad, M., & Yasir, A. (2022). Households’ Perception and Environmentally Friendly Technology Adoption: Implications for Energy Efficiency. Frontiers in Energy Research, 10(March), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.830286

Gao, S., Xu, M., Guo, N., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Mechanical Properties of Glued‐Laminated Timber with Different Assembly Patterns. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2019(1). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9495705

Gong, M. (2019). Lumber-Based Mass Timber Products in Construction. In Timber Buildings and Sustainability. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85808

Gong, Y., Liu, R., Yao, L., Ren, H., & Xu, J. (2024). Innovation analysis of carbon emissions from the production of glued laminated timber in China based on real-time monitoring data. Journal of Cleaner Production, 469, 143174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143174

Grimm, L. G., & Yarnold, P. R. (1995). Reading and understanding multivariate statistics. American psychological association.

Gysling, J., Kahler, C., Soto, D., Mejías, W., & Poblete, P. (2023). CHARACTERIZATION OF GLUED-LAMINATED TIMBER SUPPLY IN CHILE. World Conference on Timber Engineering (WCTE 2023), 4483–4490. https://doi.org/10.52202/069179-0584

He, X., & Zhu, X. (2024). Two-dimensional acoustic emission source localization on layered engineered wood by machine learning: a case study of laminated veneer lumber plate structure. Structural Health Monitoring, 23(4), 2423–2442. https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217231202544

Høibø, O., Hansen, E., Nybakk, E., & Nygaard, M. (2018). Preferences for urban building materials: Does building culture background matter? Forests, 9(8), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9080504

Ibrahim, S. (2023). Wood’s Potential as an Eco-Friendly Building Material: A Comparative Study of Wood and Steel Columns in Reducing Energy Consumption and Carbon Emissions in Construction. Uppsala Universitet.

Islam, H., Bhuiyan, M., Tushar, Q., Navaratnam, S., & Zhang, G. (2022). Effect of Star Rating Improvement of Residential Buildings on Life Cycle Environmental Impacts and Costs. Buildings, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12101605

Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141–151.

Koutsianitis, D., Ninikas, K., Mitani, A., Ntalos, G., Miltiadis, N., Vasilios, A., Taghiyari, H. R., & Papadopoulos, A. N. (2021). Thermal Transmittance, Dimensional Stability, and Mechanical Properties of a Three-Layer Laminated Wood Made from Fir and Meranti and Its Potential Application for Wood-Frame Windows. Coatings, 11(3), 304. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11030304

Larasati, D., Aisha, H., Hanifah, Y., Triyadi, S., Suhendri, & Primasetra, A. (2023). Effects of utilizing various types of facade material on the Embodied and operational energy; a case study of apartment building in Indonesia. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2023.2287221

Maximo, Y. I., Hassegawa, M., Verkerk, P. J., & Missio, A. L. (2022). Forest Bioeconomy in Brazil: Potential Innovative Products from the Forest Sector. Land, 11(8), 1297. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11081297

Morin-Bernard, A., Blanchet, P., Dagenais, C., & Achim, A. (2020). Use of northern hardwoods in glued-laminated timber: a study of bondline shear strength and resistance to moisture. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 78(5), 891–903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-020-01572-3

Mulyano, Y., Rahadi, R. A., & Amaliah, U. (2020). Millennials Housing Preferences Model in Jakarta. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 5(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2020.5.1.240

Purba, C. Y. C., Pot, G., Viguier, J., Ruelle, J., & Denaud, L. (2019). The influence of veneer thickness and knot proportion on the mechanical properties of laminated veneer lumber (LVL) made from secondary quality hardwood. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 77(3), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-019-01400-3

Puttamanjaiah, R., Thangamuthu, M., Thangamani, D., & Patil, H. (2024). Consumer Adoption Behaviour of Smart, Green, and Sustainable Building Materials for Future Cities and Environment: Extension of UTAUT 2 Model. Future Cities and Environment, 10(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5334/fce.273

Romero, A., & Odenbreit, C. (2023). Experimental Investigation on Strength and Stiffness Properties of Laminated Veneer Lumber (LVL). Materials, 16(22), 7194. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16227194

Sandoli, A., D’Ambra, C., Ceraldi, C., Calderoni, B., & Prota, A. (2021). Sustainable cross-laminated timber structures in a seismic area: Overview and future trends. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 11(5), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052078

Shin, B., Chang, S. J., Wi, S., & Kim, S. (2023). Estimation of energy demand and greenhouse gas emission reduction effect of cross-laminated timber (CLT) hybrid wall using life cycle assessment for urban residential planning. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 185(July), 113604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113604

Singh, N., Rana, A., & Badhotiya, G. K. (2021). Raw material particle terminologies for development of engineered wood. Materials Today: Proceedings, 46, 11243–11246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.616

Su, X., & Zhang, X. (2016). A detailed analysis of the embodied energy and carbon emissions of steel-construction residential buildings in China. Energy and Buildings, 119, 323–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.03.070

Tannert, T., & Loss, C. (2022). Contemporary and Novel Hold-Down Solutions for Mass Timber Shear Walls. Buildings, 12(2), 202. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020202

Triwibowo, D., Sejati, P. S., Gopar, M., Sudarmanto, S., Akbar, F., Purnomo, D., Kusumah, S. S., Amin, Y., & Dwianto, W. (2020). Karakteristik Cross Laminated Timber (CLT) dari Kayu Jati Platinum Hasil Penjarangan dan Limbah Batang Kelapa Sawit (Characteristic of Cross Laminated Timber (CLT) from Thinned Platinum Teak and Oil Palm Stem Waste). Jurnal Sylva Lestari, 8(3), 340. https://doi.org/10.23960/jsl38340-350

United Nations Environment Programme. (2022). Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Towards a Zero‑emission, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector. In United Nations Environment Programme (Vol. 224).

Vida, C., Lukacevic, M., Hochreiner, G., & Füssl, J. (2023). Size effect on bending strength of glued laminated timber predicted by a numerical simulation concept including discrete cracking. Materials & Design, 225, 111550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.111550

Wei, P., Wang, B. J., Li, H., Wang, L., Peng, S., & Zhang, L. (2019). A comparative study of compression behaviors of cross-laminated timber and glued-laminated timber columns. Construction and Building Materials, 222, 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.139

Younis, A., & Dodoo, A. (2022). Cross-laminated timber for building construction: A life-cycle-assessment overview. Journal of Building Engineering, 52(April), 104482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104482

Downloads

Published

2025-07-22

How to Cite

Melino, E., Larasati, D., & Kusuma, H. E. (2025). Criteria in Utilizing Engineered Wood in Residential Construction: A Community Preference Analysis. DIMENSI (Journal of Architecture and Built Environment), 52(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.52.1.71-82

Issue

Vol. 52 No. 1 (2025): JULY 2025

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:


    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).