campus environment, informal learning space, reading, response, undergraduate students.


Potential of informal learning spaces (ILS) in promoting reading activities are one of a theme of space that can be explored in higher education. This explanatory study was aimed at identifying ILS at selected university which preferred by students as reading space and their relation to students’ responses. Students tend to choose library ILS but non-library ILS also have potential in supporting the responses to be achieved. Students were found to have better comprehension, a good mood, and to read longer in library ILS. Meanwhile, students found it easier to pay attention and felt an increased desire to engage in discussions in non-library ILS, and tended to visit these more often. At this case study, library ILS tends to be used for individual activities, while non-library ILS are used for collaborative or group activities. Adapting function and type of space between ILS categories can be part of efforts to create learning engagement and to support both individual and collaborative work.

Author Biographies

Angela Christysonia Tampubolon, Petra Christian University

Department of Architecture

Hanson E Kusuma, Institut Teknologi Bandung

Department of Architecture


Astin, A. W., & Antonio, A. L. (2012). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education (2nd ed.). Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.

Axelson, R. D., & Flick, A. (2010). Defining student engagement. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 43(1), 38–43.

Barnacle, R. (2016). New frontiers: Exploring the space/s of higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, 35(1), 1–3.

Barrett, P., Davies, F., Zhang, Y., & Barrett, L. (2015). The impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning: Final results of a holistic, multi-level analysis. Building and Environment, 89, 118–133.

Beckers, R., Voordt, T. Van Der, & Dewulf, G. (2016a). Learning space preferences of higher education students. Building and Environment, 104, 243–252.

Beckers, R., Voordt, T. Van Der, & Dewulf, G. (2016b). Why do they study there? Diary research into students’ learning space choices in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(1), 142–157.

Benfield, J. A., Rainbolt, G. N., Bell, P. A., & Donovan, G. H. (2015). Classrooms with nature views: Evidence of differing student perceptions and behaviors. Environment and Behavior, 47(2), 140–157.

Bohn-gettler, C. M., & Rapp, D. N. (2011). Depending on my mood: Mood-driven influences on text comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 562–577.

Bryant, F. B., & Yarnold, P. R. (1995). Principal-component analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In Reading and Understanding Multivariate Statistics (pp. 99–130). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Cross, J. (2007). Informal learning: Rediscovering the natural pathways that inspire innovation and performance. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.

Cunningham, M., & Walton, G. (2016). Informal learning spaces (ILS) in university libraries and their campuses: A Loughborough University case study. New Library World, 117(1/2), 49–62.

Ditjen PAUD-DIKMAS. (2016, April 12). Gerakan Indonesia Membaca: “Menumbuhkan Budaya Membaca.” Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Masyarakat. Retrieved from

Egidi, G., & Gerrig, R. J. (2009). How valence affects language processing: Negativity bias and mood congruence in narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 37(5), 547–555.

Fisher, K., & Newton, C. (2014). Transforming the twenty-first-century campus to enhance the net-generation student learning experience: using evidence-based design to determine what works and why in virtual/physical teaching spaces. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(5), 903–920.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.

Gifford, R., Steg, L., & Reser, J. P. (2011). Environmental psychology. In P. R. Martin, F. M. Cheung, M. Knowle, M. Kyrios, L. Littlefield, J. B. Overmier, & J. M. Prieto (Eds.), IAAP handbooks of applied psychology (pp. 440–470). London: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Graetz, K. A. (2006). The psychology of Learning Environments. In D. Oblinger & J. K. Lippincott (Eds.), Learning Spaces (pp. 60–75). Brockport Bookshelf. Retrieved from

Harrop, D., & Turpin, B. (2013). A study exploring learners’ informal learning space behaviors, attitudes, and preferences. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 19(1), 58–77.

Hygge, S., & Knez, I. (2001). Effects of noise, heat and indoor lighting on cognitive performance and self-reported affect. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 291–299.

Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141–151.

Kemenristek Dikti. (2016). Laporan Tahunan Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia 2016. Retrieved from

Klatte, M., Spilski, J., Mayerl, J., Möhler, U., Lachmann, T., & Bergström, K. (2017). Effects of aircraft noise on reading and quality of life in primary school children in Germany : Results from the NORAH Study. Environment and Behavior, 49(4), 390–424.

Kumar, R. (2011). Research Methodology: a step by step guide for beginners. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.

Marchand, G. C., Nardi, N. M., Reynolds, D., & Pamoukov, S. (2014). The impact of the classroom built environment on student perceptions and learning. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 187–197.

Matthews, K. E., Andrews, V., & Adams, P. (2011). Social learning spaces and student engagement. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(2), 105–120.

Montgomery, S. E. (2014). Library space assessment: User learning behaviors in the library. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(1), 70–75.

Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. (Vol. 2). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Pituch, K. A., & Stevens, J. P. (2016). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences: Analyses with SAS and IBM’s SPSS (6th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

Plant, E. A., Ericsson, K. A., Hill, L., & Asberg, K. (2005). Why study time does not predict grade point average across college students: Implications of deliberate practice for academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(1), 96–116.

Royer, J. M. (2001). Developing reading based listening tests comprehension Sentence Sentence Verification Technique (SVT). Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45(1), 30–41. Retrieved from

Scannell, L., Hodgson, M., Villarreal, J. G. M., & Gifford, R. (2016). The role of acoustics in the perceived suitability of, and well-being in, informal learning spaces. Environment and Behavior, 48(6), 769–795.

Schunk, D. H. (1996). Goal and self-evaluative influences during children’s cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 359–382.

Sommer, R. (1970). The ecology of study areas. Environment and Behavior, 2(3), 271–280.

Szalma, J. L., & Hancock, P. A. (2011). Noise effects on human performance: A meta-analytic synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 682–707.

Temple, P. (2008). Learning spaces in higher education: An under-researched topic. London Review of Education, 6(3), 229–241.

Thomas, H. (2010). Learning spaces, learning environments and the dis“placement” of learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 502–511.

Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1999). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule-expanded form. Iowa Research Online, 277(6), 1–27.

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.

Zilvinskis, J., Masseria, A. A., & Pike, G. R. (2017). Student engagement and student learning: Examining the convergent and discriminant validity of the revised National Survey of Student Engagement. Research in Higher Education, 58(8), 880–903.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183.

Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2002). Acquiring writing revision and self-regulatory skill through observation and emulation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 660–668.