REFLECTION ON ECOLOGICAL LEARNING THROUGH ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STUDIO

Authors

  • Diandra Pandu Saginatari Department of Architecture, Universitas Indonesia, Depok
  • Paramita Atmodiwirjo Department of Architecture, Universitas Indonesia, Depok

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.45.1.73-84

Keywords:

Ecological learning, creative response, architectural design studio

Abstract

Architecture, both in the practice and the education, is moving toward a higher environmental awareness. It is shown from the inclusion of ecology as one of the core subject in the curriculum. But, ecology is dominantly viewed and learned through a scientific and qualitative approach rather than a creative design methodology. This paper argues that ecology always has a potential to become the basis of creative design process. There are three key aspects in learning ecology in architecture: learning ecology as reading complexity, as understanding dynamicity, and as building up awareness of our position as designers. These key learning aspects are enabled by the nature of architectural design studio as educational environment. This paper examines the key aspects of ecological learning within one of the design studio in Universitas Indonesia. The study concludes that there is a relationship between the learning stages of the design project and the ecological understanding of the students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahern, J., et al. (2002). Integrating ecology “across” the curriculum of landscape architecture. Johnson, B. R., & Hill, K. (Eds.). Ecology and design: Frameworks for learning (397-414). Washington, DC: Island Press.

Auer, M. R. (2008). Sensory perception, rationalism and outdoor environmental education. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 17(1), pp. 6–12.

Catalá, A. (2010). Numerical ecosystems. Architectural Design, 80(6), pp.86-93.

Goodbun, J. (2012). Flexibility and ecological planning: Gregory Bateson on Urbanism. Architectural Design, 82(4), pp. 52-55.

Hartvigsen, G., Kinzig, A. & Peterson, G. (1998). Complex adaptive systems: Use and analysis of complex adaptive systems in ecosystem science: Overview of special section. Ecosystems, 1(5), pp. 427-430.

Johnson, B. R. & Hill, K. (Eds.). (2002). Ecology and design: Frameworks for learning. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Johnson, B.R., Silbernagel, J., Hostetler, M., Mills, A., Ndubisi, F., Fife, E. & Hunter, M. R. (2002). The nature of dialogue and the dialogue of nature: Designers and ecologist in collaboration. Johnson, B. R., & Hill, K. (Eds.). Ecology and design: Frameworks for learning (305-356). Washington, DC: Island Press.

Karr, J.R. (2002). What from ecology is relevant to design and planning?. Johnson, B. R. & Hill, K. (Eds.). Ecology and design: Frameworks for learning (133-172). Washington, DC: Island Press.

Nassauer, J.I. (2002). Ecological science and landscape design: A necessary relationship in changing. Johnson, B. R., & Hill, K. (Eds.). Ecology and design: Frameworks for learning (217-230). Washington, DC: Island Press.

Orr, D. W. (2002). The nature of design: ecology, culture, and human intention. New York: Oxford University Press.

Saginatari, D. P. & Atmodiwirjo, P. (2018). Ecology: Creative Tool in Understanding Interrelated System. SHS Web of Conferences, 41, 06002.

Sarkar, S. (2016). Ecology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford. edu/archives/win2016/entries/ecology/

Poole, K., Galatowitsch, S., Grese, R., Johnston, D., Keller., J. T., Richey, D. & Woodward, J. (2002). Building ecological understanding in design studio: A repertoire for a well-crafted learning experience. Johnson, B. R., & Hill, K. (Eds.). Ecology and design: Frameworks for learning (415-472). Washington, DC: Island Press.

Wang, T. (2010). A new paradigm for design studio education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(2), pp. 173–183.

Watson, R. (2014). Learning from the environment and making: Using analysis and the senses. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 9(1), pp. 69–88.

Yatmo, Y. A. & Atmodiwirjo, P. (2013). Sneezing as a Form of Transaction between Active Body and Space. The Senses and Society, 8(2), pp. 193–207.

Downloads

Published

2018-07-31

How to Cite

Saginatari, D. P., & Atmodiwirjo, P. (2018). REFLECTION ON ECOLOGICAL LEARNING THROUGH ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STUDIO. DIMENSI (Journal of Architecture and Built Environment), 45(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.45.1.73-84

Issue

Section

Articles