• M. Donny Koerniawan



Urban structure, outdoor thermal comfort, microclimate, PET.


Urban and microclimate have intense relationship that affecting each other’s. Specific urban structure can affect microclimate because of high radiation generated. In the other side, urban structure blocks distribution of incoming wind. Urban structure changes how the microclimate influences the city. The successful urban structure can impact how outdoors open spaces are used meanwhile good open spaces are affected by how comfortable can be accepted. Microclimate control is the first element has to be considered to design comfortable outdoor open spaces. This research used monthly mean air temperature, relative humidity, precipitation, vapor pressure, and wind velocity for the period 2009–20014 to simulate any type of microclimate situation that influence thermal comfort in the urban context. Data were collected from 3 selected meteorological stations in Jakarta and websites. PET (physiological equivalent temperature) is used to assess the value of thermal comfort in outdoor spaces. This study shows that hot-humid city has abundance solar radiation, which influences the heat in the urban area that need to be released immediately meanwhile because of the urban structure reduce the wind velocity that enter into the urban area, the city does not has strong energy to release the heat. So urban structure has to be well designed to make wind can release the heat trapped in the urban area.


Download data is not yet available.


Algeciras, Rodríguez, J.A., & Matzarakis, A. (2015). Human thermal comfort conditions and urban planning in hot humid climates The case of Cuba. International Journal of Biometeorology, 60(8), pp.1151–1164.

Abreu L., Labaki, L. & Matzarakis A (2014) Thermal bioclimate as a factor in urban and architectural planning in tropical climates the case of Campinas, Brazil. Urban Ecosystem, 17, pp. 489–500. doi:10.1007/s11252- 013-0339-7

Ali-Toudert, F. & Mayer, H. (2007). Thermal comfort in an east west oriented street canyon in Freiburg (Germany) under hot summer conditions. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 87, pp.223–237.

Aden, N. et al. (2013). Thermal comfort conditions of shaded outdoor spaces in hot and humid climate of Malaysia. Building and Environment, 41(2), pp.7–14.

Eliasson, I. (2000). The use of climate knowledge in urban planning. Landscape Urban Planning, 48 (1–2), pp.31–44

Fanger, P. O. (1972). Thermal comfort. McGraw Hill, New York.

Fröhlich, D. & Matzarakis, A. (2013). Modeling of changes in thermal bioclimate: examples based on urban spaces in Freiburg, Germany. Theo-retical and Applied Climatolology, 111, pp.547-558.

Givoni, B. (1994). Building design principles for hot humid regions. Renewable Energy, Vol. 5(2), 906-916.

Höppe, P. (1993). Heat balance modelling. Experientia, 49, pp.741–746.

Höppe, P. (1999). The physiological equivalent temperature – a universal index for the biometeoro logical assessment of the thermal environment. International Journal Biometeorol, 43, pp.71–75.

Jendritzky, G. & Tinz, B. (1999). Human bioclimate maps for climate impact research; Proceedings of International Conference of Biomet and International Conference on Urban Climate. ICB-ICUC '99, Sydney 1999; Geneva: WCASP; 2000. pp. 63–83. WMO/TD No. 1026.

Ketterer, C. & Matzarakis, A. (2014). Human Bio meteorological Assessment of Heat Stress Reduction by Replanning Measures In Stuttgart, Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning, 122, pp.78–88.

Koerniawan, M.D. (2015). Thermal Comfort Investigation in Three Hot-Humid Climate Theme Parks in Jakarta. American Journal of Environ-mental Sciences, 11(3), pp.133–144.

Lin, T.P. & Matzarakis, A. (2008). Tourism climate and thermal comfort in Sun Moon Lake, Taiwan. International Journal of Biometeorology, 52(4), pp.281–290.

Mayer, H., Holst, J., Dostal, P., Imbery, F. & Schindler, D. (2008). Human thermal comfort insummer within an urban street canyon in Central Europe. Meteorol Z., 17, pp.241–50.

Matzarakis, A. & Amelung, B. (2008). Physiological Equivalent Temperature as Indicator for Impacts of Climate Change on Thermal Comfort of Humans. Media, 30, pp.161–172.

Matzarakis, A., Mayer, H. & Iziomon, M. (1999). Heat stress in Greece. Applications of a universal thermal index: physiological equivalent temperature. International Journal Biometeorol, 43, pp.76–84.

Matzarakis, A. & Mayer, H., (1996). Another kind of environmental stress: Thermal stress. WHO collaborating centre for Air Quality Management and Air pollution Control. NEWS LETTERS, 18, pp.7–10.

Oke, T.R. (1984). Towards a prescription for the greater use of climatic principles in settlement planning. Energy and Buildings, 7(1), pp.1–10.

Rodríguez, A. J.A. et al., (2016). Human thermal comfort conditions and urban planning in hot humid climates The case of Cuba. International Journal of Biometeorology, 60(8), pp.1151–1164.

Spagnolo, J. & de Dear, R. (2003). A field study of thermal comfort in outdoor and semi outdoor environments in subtropical Sydney Australia. Build Environment, 38, pp.721–738.

Stewart, I.D. & Oke, T.R., (2012). Local climate zones for urban temperature studies. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 93(12), pp.1879–1900.

UNEP, (2007). Liveable Cities the Benefits of Urban Environmental Planning I., Washington DC: The Cities Alliance.

VDI, (1998). VDI 3787, Part I: Environmental meteorology, Methods for the human biometeorological evaluation of climate and air quality for the urban and regional planning at regional level. Part I: Climate. Beuth, Berlin. pp. 39.




How to Cite

Koerniawan, M. D. (2017). THE CLIMATE SENSITIVE DESIGN IN HOT-HUMID URBAN DESIGN. DIMENSI (Journal of Architecture and Built Environment), 44(2), 137-142.