• SARI Suzanna Ratih
  • WAHYUNINGRUM Sri Hartuti



Tourism activities, social cohesion, tourism spatial conflict.


Borobudur as one of the international tourist’s destination in Indonesia which having compromised their sense of identity before, tourists have their own set of images about tourism destinations. In that destination tourists usually create some tourism activities which needed space to facilitate. Many times such condition caused many problems that lead conflict among the local people. People tried to provide some supporting tourist facilities in order to fulfil the needs of tourist’s activities. People will further utilize some spaces of their village to build tourist facilities. Rich people usually dominated this kind of business. This becomes the fact that many of the fears surrounding tourism are closely associated with a wide range of social problems, especially in terms of determining tourism spatial. Each people tried to collect dollar from tourist as much as possible to provide tourism spatial by ignoring “guyub” and “gotong royong” as traditional principle of their live. This may create disharmony among the society and some people will not get the benefit from tourism activities. Therefore, to learn more detail about the role of “guyub and gotong royong” as social cohesion among people in Borobudur, there is a need to do this research in order to give some recommended strategy to solve thr problem regarding social cohesion and tourism spatial. By using descriptive method, researcher would like to present a case study about that matter in one of tourism village in Borobudur. The output of this research is to give an overview how tourism activities give significant influence towards the power of social cohesion in reducing the appeared conflict. The developed strategy will be used to tighten the relationship among the people, through re-empowering the traditional social cohesion so called ”guyub” and “gotong-royong”. By doing so, it is expected that integrity and cohesiveness in a social structure could always be maintained


Download data is not yet available.


Council of Europe (2008). Report of the High Level Task Force on Social Cohesion in the 21st century. [CrossRef]

House of Commons (2004), available at: [CrossRef]

IABD (2006). Social cohesion in Latin America and the Caribbean-Analysis, action and coordination. Washington D.C. [CrossRef]

Karamoy, A., Gillan, D. & Attashendartini, H. (1983). Community Based Delivery of Social Services in Indonesia: Case Study in Kampung Kebong Kosong. Jakarta: International Development Research Centre in Cooperation with the Institute for Social and Economic Research, Education and Information. [CrossRef]

Koentjaraningrat (1985). Kebudayaan, Mentalitas, dan Pembangunan.Jakarta: Gramedia. [CrossRef]

Maxwell, J. (1996). Social dimensions of economic growth. Eric John Hanson Memorial Lecture Series. University of Alberta. [CrossRef]

Ritzen (2000). "Social Cohesion, Public Policy, and Economic Growth: Implications for OECD countries", available at: dataoecd/25/2/1825690.pdf [CrossRef]




How to Cite

Suzanna Ratih, S., Edi, D., & Sri Hartuti, W. (2016). THE ROLE OF SOCIAL COHESION AS STRATEGY FOR REDUCING TOURISM SPATIAL CONFLICT. Dimensi: Journal of Architecture and Built Environment, 43(2), 131-136.