The Role of Spatial Political Economy in Shaping Urban Design
Analyzing Alexander Cuthbert’s Theoretical Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.51.2.83-92Keywords:
production of space, mainstream urban design, new urban design, spatial political economy, Alexander CuthbertAbstract
Like other disciplines, urban design is grounded in substantial theoretical foundations, despite differences among experts. Although urban design has undergone significant transformations over time, the evolving needs of urban spaces have played a critical role in shaping its adaptation. Notably, the theoretical and real objects of urban design—civil society and the public realm—are regarded as superior to those of related fields such as architecture and civil engineering. The development of a robust theoretical foundation for urban design through the lens of spatial political economy, as conceptualized by Alexander Cuthbert, has proven to be highly valuable. Cuthbert identified the integrative knowledge of urban design as the outcome of a coherent foundation that unites both theory and practice. This research adopts a theoretical and fundamental approach, utilizing a descriptive-analytical method and employing content analysis. By examining the evolution of Cuthbert's perspectives, the study seeks to analyze urban design through the framework of spatial political economy. The findings indicate that the dialectical relationship between urban design and Spatial Political Economy (SPE) establishes urban design as a distinct and structured discipline. This mutual dialectic is reflected in the process of place-making, where the production and reproduction of space align with the principles of SPE, and urban design serves as the mechanism for shaping urban spaces. It is clear that urban design stands as its own discipline, without requiring idealizations borrowed from other fields. Spatial Political Economy provides the most comprehensive framework for understanding urban design. Cuthbert’s perspective ultimately fosters a convergence of overlapping ideas, enabling the development of a strong theoretical foundation for urban design that promotes the enhancement of the public realm in cities.
Downloads
References
Abyaneh, M., & Reza, H. (2012). Comparative comparison of urban morphology studies schools to complete it based on the analytical system of the spatial political economy school. Armanshahr, (7), 171-159. [Persian]
Afroogh, E. (1998). Space and social inequality: A study of spatial separation and the concentration of poverty in Tehran Residential Neighborhoods. Doctoral Thesis in Sociology. Tarbiat Modares University. [Persian]
Bahrainy, H. (1981). Recognition of the knowledge base and language of urban design, Ph. D. diss. University, od Wash, Seatlle.
Barnett, J. (1982). An introduction to urban design. HarperCollins Publishers.
Barnett, J. (1996). The fractured metropolis: Improving the new city, restoring the old city, reshaping the region. Westview Press.
Barnett, J. (2014). Do not define urban design too narrowly. Journal of Urban Design, 19(1), 49–52.
Barnett, J. (2020). Urban design for a warming climate. Journal of Urban Design, 25(10), 3-5. DOI: 10.1080/13574809.2019.1706321.
Bentley, I. (2002). Urban designers as artists, URBAN DESIGN International, 97(3-4), 143-152.
Biddulph, M. (2012). The problem with thinking about or for urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 17(1), 1–20.
Calderon, C. (2019). Unearthing the political: differences, conflicts and power in participatory urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 25(1), 50-64. DOI:10.1080/13574809.2019.1677146.
Carmona, M., de Magalhães, C., & Edwards, M. (2002). What value urban design?. URBAN DESIGN International, 7(2), 63-81.
Childs, M. C. (2019). Urban design foresight, Journal of Urban Design, 25(1), 9-11. DOI: 10.1080/13574809.2019.1706309.
Cozzolino, S., Polívka, J., Fox-Kämper, R., Reimer, M., & Kummel, O. (2020). What is urban design? A proposal for a common understanding, Journal of Urban Design, 25(1), 35-49. DOI: 10.1080/13574809.2019.1705776.
Cuesta, R., Sarris, C., Signoretta, P., & Moughtin, J. C. (2012). Urban design: Method and techniques. Routledge.
Cuthbert A.R. (2013). The new urban design – A social theory of architecture? China architecture review. Chungching.
Cuthbert, A. R. (2003). Designing cities: Critical readings in urban design. Blackwell Pub.
Cuthbert, A. R. (2006). The form of cities: Political economy and urban design. Blackwell Pub.
Cuthbert, A. R. (2007). Urban design: Requiem for an era–review and critique of the last 50 years. Urban Design International, 12, 177–223.
Cuthbert, A. R. (2011). Understanding cities: Method in urban design. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203817933
Cuthbert, A. R. (2014a). Alphaville and masdar: the future of urban space and form? In Emergent Urbanism (9-17). Ashgate Publishing.
Cuthbert, A.R. (2007). Urban design: requiem for an era – review and critique of the last 50 years, URBAN DESIGN International. 12(4), 177-223.
Cuthbert, A.R. (2009). Review article – Urban design, Alex Krieger and William S. Saunders (eds). Minneapolis. MN: University of Minnesota Press
Cuthbert, R. A., (2005). A debate from down-under: spatial political economy and urban design. URBAN DESIGN International. 10, 223–234.
Cuthbert, R. A., (2014b). Wiley encyclopedia of social science: urban design. The University of New South Wales. Australia.
Cuthbert, R. A., (2016a). No more Michelangelo’s ‒ no more art. Journal of Urban Design, 21(4), 429-431.
Cuthbert, R. A., (2016b) Emergent pedagogy or critical thinking? Journal of Urban Design, 21(5), 551-554.
Cuthbert, R. A., (2018). Sustainability is dead. Long live environmental justice! Editorial ruang/space (Space: Journal of the Built Environment), 5(2), 1-7.
Cuthbert, R. A., (2019a). Urban design - the synthesis discipline. Space: Journal of the Built Environment, 6(1), 1-4.
Cuthbert, R. A., (2019b). Urban design - the case of Bali. Space: Journal of the Built Environment, 6(2), 115-116.
Cuthbert, R. A., (2020). Eliot’s insight – the future of urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 25(1), 11-14.
Dadgar, Y. (2006). The proliferation of political economy. Journal of Economic Research, 5(15), 1-24. [Persian]
Dovey, K. (2020). Urban design as a contested field. Journal of Urban Design, 25(1), 14–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2019.1706896
Dovey, K. (2019). Urban design as a contested field. Journal of Urban Design, 25(1), 14-16. DOI: 10.1080/13574809.2019.1706896.
Fontana, M. P., Mayorga, M., & Roa, M. (2016). Le corbusier: urban visions through thresholds. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 40(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.3846/20297955.2016.1196541
Fuchs, C. (2019). Henri lefebvre’s theory of the production of space and the critical theory of communication. Communication Theory, 29(2), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qty025
Golkar, K. (1997). Environmental images: a place-based approach to urban design. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Architecture, the University of Sydney, Australia.
Golkar, Koroush. (2004). From birth to the maturity of urban design. Sofeh, 13(36), 9-23. [Persian]
Golkar, Koroush. (2011). Urban design, process or processes. Sofeh, 21(1), 99-134. [Persian]
Gospodini, A. (2020). Urban design: the evolution of concerns, the increasing power, challenges and perspectives. Journal of Urban Design, 25(1), 16-20. DOI: 10.1080/13574809.2019.1706894
Jencks, C. (1987). Le Corbusier and the tragic view of architecture (rev. ed). Penguin Books.
Katouzian, & Ali, M. (1994). Political economy of Iran. Translation: Mohammad Reza Nafisi and Kambiz Azizi. Tehran: Markaz Publication. [Persian]
Koolhaas, R. (1995). What ever happened to urbanism. Edited by: Koolhaas R, Mau B. Köln: S, M, L, XL, Taschen; 1995: 961–971.
Kostof, S., & Tobias, R. (2014). The city shaped: Urban patterns and meanings through history (1. paperback ed). Thames & Hudson.
Kreditor, A. (1990). The neglect of urban design in the American academic succession. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 9, 155–163.
Lang, J. T. (2019). Programmes and paradigms in urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 25(1), 20-22. DOI: 10.1080/13574809.2019.1706320.
Le Corbusier (1925). Urbanisme, Éditions Crès, Collection de “L’Esprit Nouveau”. Paris
Le Corbusier. (1987). The city of to-morrow and its planning. Dover.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2020). Responsibilities and challenges of urban design in the 21st century. Journal of Urban Design, 25(1), 22-24. DOI: 10.1080/13574809.2019.1706880.
Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. MIT Press.
Madanipour, A. (1997). Ambiguities of urban design, TPR 68(3).
Madanipour, A. (2019). Contextuality of shrinkage and positionality of urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 24(1), 65-67. DOI: 10.1080/13574809.2019.1553821
Marshall, S. (2016). The kind of art urban design is. Journal of Urban Design, 21(4), 399-423.
Norberg-Schulz, C. (2015). Existence, space and architecture. Translation: Dr. Vida Norouz Borazjani. Parham naghsh. First Edition. [Persian]
Palermo, P. (2014). What ever is happening to urban planning and urban design? Musings on the current gap between theory and practice. City, Territory and Architecture, 1(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/2195-2701-1-7
Piran, Parviz. (1992). Theoretical perspectives on the sociology of city and urbanization: Iranian currency developments and equality rates. Journal of Political-Economic Information. No. 51-52. Pp. 81-75. [Persian]
Pittas, M. J. (1980). Defining urban design. Urban Design International, 1(2), 40.
Rabaça, A. (2016). Le corbusier, the city, and the modern utopia of dwelling. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 40(2), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.3846/20297955.2016.1183529
Rezaei, M. (2005). Urban design in the third millennium (Influences and the new role of information and communication in urban design). Sofeh, 15(40). [Persian]
Rowley, A. (1994). Definitions of Urban Design: the nature and concerns of urban design. Planning Practice and Research, 9(3).
Schurch, T. W. (1999). Reconsidering urban design: Thoughts about its definition and status as a field or profession. Journal of Urban Design, 4(1).
Sequeira, M. (2016). Rethinking le corbusier: urban design and history. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 40(2), 59–59. https://doi.org/10.3846/20297955.2016.1195037
Shamloo, I., Javad & Rafiean, M. (2017). The power and redefinition of urban planning theory (with emphasis on the spatial political economy of space). Rahbord. Twenty-fifth year. 80. Fall 2016. 319-287. [Persian]
Shirvani, H. (1985). The urban design process. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, Inc.
Silva, C. N. (2015). Book review: Emergent urbanism. Urban planning & design in times of structural and systemic change. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 4(3), 75-77.
Spreiregen, P. D. (1965). Urban design: The architecture of towns and cities. McGraw-Hill New York.
Torkameh, A. (2014). University and the problem of the city: A critique of the dominant approach to urban planning and capitalist space production.
Vafa, M., Habibollah, Razavian, M. T., & Momeni, M. (2010). The role of political economy in the spatial structure of tehran and around. Journal of Environmental Studies, 35(50), 14-1. [Persian]
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
