THE ROLE OF EDGES AND STREETS IN RELATION TO PHYSICAL LINKAGE IN INFORMAL PARTS OF THE CITY (Case Studies: Hegarmanah and Ciumbuleuit sub-districts, Bandung, Indonesia)

Authors

  • Claudia Montenegro Vieira Santos UNPAR Bandung
  • Yohanes Basuki Dwisusanto Parahyangan Catholic University
  • Karyadi Kusliansjah Parahyangan Catholic University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.48.1.55-64

Keywords:

Integration, linkage, connectivity, segregation

Abstract

Exchange between people and the environment is a relevant element as we experience space through physical connection. Boundaries can be represented by edges and streets, lack of permeability and connectivity can become a phenomenon that affects informal areas through narrowing of streets, road blockages, forms of control. This research aims to investigate physical linkage and connectivity in the integration between formal and informal areas of the city, identifying how edges and streets play a role as contributors or barriers.  Qualitative method is applied through investigative approach, to identify how integration is prevented. The objective is to describe the complexity in the interaction between formal and informal areas, the built-form and open space. Hegarmanah and Ciumbuleuit subdistricts in Bandung will be analysed. Findings show Hegarmanah as an enclosed configuration with more incidence of controlled areas, physical barriers, restrictions, circulation limitations. Ciumbuleuit presents less controlled areas, encouraging use of public space, services, commerce, commuting; interaction between pedestrians and built environment has experienced more adaptation, through open configuration. The coexistence of formal and informal urban areas has been endangered due to isolation and the way linkage is established. Physical linkage is restricted because of space configuration, borders and forms of control, obstructing integration process, impairing connectivity, encouraging spatial segregation. Finally, integration will be stimulated when space is articulated and able to adapt.

References

A D Nasution et al. (2018), “Public open space as the only urban space for walking: Sumatera Utara Experience”, Architecture Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, IOP Conference Series: Earth Environ. Sci. 126 012215, Research Gate.

Carmona, M., Heath, T., Taner, O., & Tiesdell, S. (2003). Public Spaces – Urban Spaces, The Dimensions of Urban Design, Architectural Press, Great Britain.

Critelli, G. (2016). “Social Segregation in Urban Area: the results of a project in the metropolitan city of Reggio Calabria”, Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, Elsevier Ltd.

Delso, J., Belén, M., Ortega, E., & Otero, I. (2017). “A Model for Assessing Pedestrian Corridors. Application to Vitoria-Gasteiz City (Spain)”, Sustainability Article.

Gehl, J. (2011). Life Between Buildings - Using Public Space, Island Press, Washington.

Habraken, N.J., & Teicher, J. (1998). The Structure of the Ordinary: Form and Control in the Built Environment. MIT Press, London.

Hillier, B. (1996). Space is the Machine - A Configurational Theory of Architecture. Cambridge University Press, London.

Kharisma, R. (2018). Essay: Usulan Bangunan Markas Komando Secapa AD Sebagai Bangunan Cagar Budaya di Bandung, Universitas Katolik Parahyangan.

Kostof, S. (1991). The City Assembled – The Elements of Urban Form Through History”, Thames and Hudson, London.

Kusliansjah, Y. K. (2017). Related Aspects in the Intervention of Urban Space Framework, Uni¬ver¬-sitas Katolik Parahyangan.

Llewelyn – Davies, R. (2013). Urban Design Compendium. English Partnerships, The Hous¬ing Corporation.

Marshall, S. (2004). Streets and Patterns. Spoon Press, Taylor and Francis Group, London and NY.

Oliveira, V. (2016). “Urban Morphology: An Introduction to the Study of the Physical Form of Cities”, Springer-The Urban Book Series.

Patel, S. (2016). Thesis: Public Spaces for All: How ‘Public’ are Public Spaces? Case of Ahmedabad city’s Riverfront Parks. Cept University, Ahmedabad.

Shirleyana, S. H., & Sunindijo, R.Y. (2018). “City of Kampung: risk and resilience in the urban communities of Surabaya, Indonesia”, Faculty of Built Environment, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Szary, A. L. A. (2018). “Boundaries and borders”, Handbook of Political Geography, Wiley-Blackwell. https://www.researchgate.net.

Shirleyana, S. H., & Sunindijo, R.Y. (2018). “City of Kampung: risk and resilience in the urban communities of Surabaya, Indonesia”, Faculty of Built Environment, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Wijaya, K., Permana, A.Y., & Suwanto, N. (2017). “Kawasan Bantaran Sungai Cikapundung Sebagai Pemukiman Masyarakat Berpenghasil¬an Rendah (MBR) Di Kota Bandung”, Arcade Jurnal Arsitektur, 1(2).

Wicaksono, S. (2020). Kota Untuk Semua. Huni¬an yang Selaras dengan Sustainable

Development Goals dan New Urban Agenda, Expose, Jakarta Selatan.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-02

Issue

Section

Articles