DOI: https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.45.2.173-180

THE MEANING OF “BOUNDARY LINE” DUE TO THE PRECAST MODULE SYSTEM IN ‘RUSUNAWA’ BUMI CENGKARENG INDAH, JAKARTA, INDONESIA

Y. Basuki Dwisusanto, Fermanto Lianto, Lilianny Sigit Arifin

Abstract


This research reveals meaning of “boundary line” due to the precast module system in Seruni 8 block, ‘Rusunawa’ Bumi Cengkareng Indah, Jakarta, Indonesia. The Grounded Theory method, with the type of “constant comparison”, which is a semi-grounded theory, is chosen to express the meaning of the “boundary line” from the residents’ point of view. The coding process in data processing uses computer program Maxqda. The results of this study indicate that well-established relationships between occupants can transform the boundaries of private corridor ownership (individual territory) into joint ownership (communal territory) as a place to socialize and share goods placed in the corridor, and maintain the cleanliness of the corridor together, so that the “boundary line” due to the precast module system for residents of the Seruni 8 block, ‘Rusunawa’ Bumi Cengkareng Indah, Jakarta, does not affect the meaning of the boundaries as the individual territory, because the communal territory is stronger than the “boundary line” due to the precast module system.

Keywords


“Boundary line”; corridor; grounded theory; precast module; ‘Rusunawa’.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afifuddin, & Saebani, B. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Altman, I. (1975). Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory and Crowd-ing. Monterey, California: Brooks Cole.

Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2011). Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide. London: SAGE.

Cho, J.Y., & Lee, E.H. (2014). Reducing Confusion about Grounded Theory and Qualitative Content Analysis: Similarities and Differences. The Qualitative Report, 19(32), 1-20.

Daymond, C., & Holloway, I. (2008). Metode-metode Riset dalam Public Relations dan Marketing Communications. (C. Wiratama, & I. S. Astuti, Trans.) Yogyakarta: Bentang.

Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in Public Place. New York: Free Press.

Hall, E.T. (1959). The Silent Language. New York: Doubleday.

Institute, G.T. (2013). What is grounded theory? Retrieved from http://www.groundedtheory. com/what-is-gt.aspx.

Lianto, F., Arifin, L., & Dwisusanto, Y. (2017). Role of Corridor in Territorial Meaning Formation in “Owned Low-Cost Apartments” (‘Rusunami’) Bidara Cina, Jakarta, Indonesia. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 7(2), 399-405.

Lyman, S.M., & Scott, M.B. (1967). Territoriality: A Neglected Sociological Dimension. Social Pro-blems, 15(2), 236-249.

Porteous, J.D. (1977). Environment and Behaviour: Planning and Everyday Urban Life. Menlo Park, California: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.

Skaburskis, J.V. (1974). Territoriality and Its Relevance to Neighborhood Design: A Review. Archi-tectural Research and Teaching, 3(1), 39-44.

Sommer, R. (1969). Personal Space: The Behavioral Basis of Design. Englewood Cliffs.

Sugiyono. (2013). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

www.maxqda.com. (2017). www.maxqda.com. Retri-eved February 2017.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.45.2.173-180



Template DIMENSI

The Journal is published by The Institute of Research & Community Outreach - Petra Christian University. It available online supported by Directorate General of Higher Education - Ministry of National Education - Republic of Indonesia.

©All right reserved 2016.Dimensi, ISSN: 0126-219X, e-ISSN: 2338-7858

 

shopify visitor statistics
View My Stats