DOI: https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.45.1.9-18

NEGOTIATED URBAN SPACE AT MANGGARAI STATION JAKARTA: THE APPROPRIATION OF SPACE BY BAJAJ DRIVERS

Yulia Nurliani Lukito, Rumishatul Ulya

Abstract


This paper aims to investigate the negotiation between the “formal” and the “informal” urban space in Jakarta through the examination of use of space of marginalized transportation of bajaj – a three-wheeled public transportation. Bajaj drivers continuously and creatively create their use of space and territory as the result of the limitation of space. Creativity in using space emerges as a way to get available space and this activity results in the appropriation of urban space. The basis of such appropriation is how to survive in urban space and such condition is characterized by negotiation, flexibility and adaptability. In high-density Jakarta city, it is necessary for bajaj drivers – who have only limited possibility in using strategic urban space – to use both the formal and the informal to sustain the city at large. An analysis of how bajaj drivers negotiated urban spaces around Manggarai Station reveals the appropriation of urban space that relies on temporality, tactics and negotiation of rules of access among users. In this paper, we analyze how urban informality as an ‘organizing logic’ results in a specific mode of the production of space. The analysis of negotiations of space around Manggarai Station is intended to contribute to an understanding of how informal and negotiated spaces, which shape everyday life in the city, are inseparable parts of formal and designed spaces in the city of Jakarta.

Keywords


Negotiated space; urban informality; urban space; manggarai station; bajaj.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Appadurai, A. (2000). Grassroots globalization and research imagination. Public Culture, 12(1), pp. 1–19.

Borden, I., Kerr, J., Randall, J. & Pivaro, A. (eds.) (2011). The Unknown City: Contesting Architecture and Social Space, Cambridge, London: MIT Press.

Crawford, M. (1999). Everyday Urbanism. New York: The Monacelli Press.

Davis, M. (2006). Planet of Slums. London: Verso.

De Certeau, M. (1984). Practice of Everyday Life, translated by Steven Rendall, Berkeley: University of California Press.

De Soto, H. (1989). The Other Path: the Invisible Revolution in the Third World. New York: Harpercollins.

Friedmann, J. (1987). Planning in the Public Domain: from Knowledge to Action. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Hackenbroch, K. (2011). Urban Informality and Negotiated Space, The Planning Review, pp. 59-69. Hill, J. (1988). Occupying Architecture: Between the Architects and the User. London: Routledge.

Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Toronto: Random House.

Kudva, N. (2009). The Everyday and the Episodic: The Spatial and Political Impacts of Urban Informality. Environment and Planning A, 41(7), pp.1614-1628.

Landry, C. (2006). The Art of City Making. London: Earthscan.

Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Cambridge: Blackwell.

Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. Cambridge: The Technology Press & Harvard University Press.

McFarlane, C. (2012). Rethinking Informality: Politics, Crisis, and the City. Plan Theory Practice, 13, pp. 89–108.

Mehrotra, R. (2008) Between Sanctioned and Shadow Order. In: Ruby I, Ruby A (eds) Urban Transformation. Berlin: Ruby Press.

Peraboni, C. (2010). Reti ecologiche e infrastrutture verdi, Milan: Maggioli Publisher.

Roy, A. & Alsayyad, N. (eds) (2004). Urban Informality: Transnational Perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia. Lanham: Lexington Books.

Sassen, S. (2006). Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Saunders, W. (ed) (2008). Can Designers Improve Life in Non-Formal Cities? Harvard Design Magazine, 28.

Upton, D. (2002). Architecture of Everyday Life. New Literary History, 33(4), pp. 707-723.

Schneekloth, L. & R. G. Shibley, R. (1995). Placemaking: The Art and Practice of Building Community, New York: Wiley.

Mochtar, M. & Yasuo Hino. 2006. “Principal Issues to Improve the Urban Transport Problems in Jakarta. Osaka.” Journal of Osaka City University, 47(2), pp.31–38.

Nguyen-Hoang, Phuong, and Ryan Yeung. 2010. “What is Paratransit Worth?” Transportation Research Part A, 44, pp. 841–853.

Sudarmanto, B., Fujiwara, A. & Zhang, J. (2013). “Does Paratransit Drivers’ Low Job Satisfaction Lead to Job Mobility? Case Study of Taxi-like Paratransit Drivers in Jakarta City, Indonesia.” Transport Research Board: 92nd Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

Sumaedi, S., Bakti, I.G., Astrini, N., Rakhmawati, T., Widianti, T. & Yarmen. M. (2014). Public Transport Passengers’ Behavioural Intentions: Paratransit in Jabodetabek, Indonesia. Singapore: Springer.

Susilo, Y. O., Santosa, W., Joewono, T.B. & Parikesit, D. (2007). “A Reflection of Motorization and Public Transport in Jakarta Metropolitan Area.” IATSS Research, 31(1), pp. 59–68.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.45.1.9-18



Template DIMENSI

The Journal is published by The Institute of Research & Community Outreach - Petra Christian University. It available online supported by Directorate General of Higher Education - Ministry of National Education - Republic of Indonesia.

©All right reserved 2016.Dimensi, ISSN: 0126-219X, e-ISSN: 2338-7858

 

shopify visitor statistics
View My Stats